Is early bilateral compression ultrasonography and D-dimer monitoring appropriately for prophylaxis and diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis after cesarean section women: a single-center observation study of Chinese Han population.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is most prevalent among parturients following a cesarean section (CS). The objective of this study was to assess the practical utility of bilateral compression ultrasonography (CUS) of the lower limbs, coupled with D-dimer monitoring, in the early diagnosis of VTE within the Han Chinese population. METHODS: Our prospective observational study included 742 women who underwent CUS and D-dimer testing on the first day post-CS. Subsequently, telephone or outpatient follow-ups were conducted until 42 days postpartum. States of hypercoagulation and thrombosis, as indicated by CUS, were classified as CUS abnormal. A D-dimer level ≥ 3 mg/l was considered the D-dimer warning value. Early ambulation and mechanical prophylaxis were universally recommended for all parturients post-CS. A sequential diagnostic strategy, based on the 2015 RCOG VTE risk-assessment tool, was employed. Therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) were administered for the treatment of thromboembolic disease. Prophylactic doses of LMWH were given for VTE prophylaxis in parturients with hypercoagulative status accompanied by D-dimer levels ≥ 3 mg/l. All high-risk women (RCOG score ≥ 4 points) were additionally treated with preventive LMWH. Statistical analyses were conducted using the R statistical software, with a two-sided P value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Fifteen cases of VTE and 727 instances without VTE were observed. The overall VTE rate post-CS was 2.02% (15/742), with 66.7% (10/15) being asymptomatic. Eleven patients received a VTE diagnosis on the first postpartum day. Among the 41 parturients exhibiting hypercoagulation ultrasound findings and D-dimer levels ≥ 3 mg/l, despite receiving pharmacological VTE prophylaxis with LMWH, 4.88% (2/41) in the high-risk group were eventually diagnosed with VTE. A total of 30.86% (229/742) exhibited normal ultrasound findings and D-dimer levels < 3 mg/l on the first day post-CS, with no VTE occurrences in the postpartum follow-up. According to RCOG's recommendation, 78.03% (579/742) of cesarean delivery women should receive prophylactic anticoagulation, while only 20.62% (153/742) met our criterion for prophylactic anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: The strategy of timely routine bilateral CUS and D-dimer monitoring is conducive to the early diagnosis and treatment of VTE, significantly reducing the use of LMWH in the Chinese Han population.

Clinical disease activity is a major determinant of plasma D-dimer elevation in outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis: A hospital-based cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with plasma D-dimer levels in outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We consecutively recruited 460 RA patients who visited our hospital for routine follow-ups between June and October 2021. Plasma D-dimer, RA-related characteristics, comorbidities, and cardiovascular and venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk factors were examined at enrolment. Patients with elevated D-dimer levels underwent whole-leg venous ultrasonography to diagnose deep vein thrombosis (DVT). RESULTS: Participants had no DVT signs or symptoms. Among them, 252 (54.8%) were positive for plasma D-dimer (≥0.5 µg/ml) and 40 (8.7%) had high D-dimer levels (≥3 µg/ml). The mean was 1.07 µg/ml. After adjustments, age [odds ratio (OR) 1.88 per additional 10 years, P = .003], high and moderate clinical disease activity index (OR 8.79, P < .001), and the presence of comorbidities or cardiovascular/VTE risk factors (OR 2.94, P = .017) were identified as the factors independently associated with high D-dimer levels. Among patients with D-dimer levels ≥3 µg/ml, 10 (25%) had DVT in their lower limbs, and D-dimer levels were significantly higher in patients with DVT compared with those without it (mean 6.0 vs. 4.1 µg/ml, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical disease activity is a major contributor to plasma D-dimer elevation in RA outpatients.

Venous Thromboembolism: Review of Clinical Challenges, Biology, Assessment, Treatment, and Modeling.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a massive clinical challenge, annually affecting millions of patients globally. VTE is a particularly consequential pathology, as incidence is correlated with extremely common risk factors, and a large cohort of patients experience recurrent VTE after initial intervention. Altered hemodynamics, hypercoagulability, and damaged vascular tissue cause deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, the two permutations of VTE. Venous valves have been identified as likely locations for initial blood clot formation, but the exact pathway by which thrombosis occurs in this environment is not entirely clear. Several risk factors are known to increase the likelihood of VTE, particularly those that increase inflammation and coagulability, increase venous resistance, and damage the endothelial lining. While these risk factors are useful as predictive tools, VTE diagnosis prior to presentation of outward symptoms is difficult, chiefly due to challenges in successfully imaging deep-vein thrombi. Clinically, VTE can be managed by anticoagulants or mechanical intervention. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants and catheter-directed thrombolysis have emerged as leading tools in resolution of venous thrombosis. While a satisfactory VTE model has yet to be developed, recent strides have been made in advancing in silico models of venous hemodynamics, hemorheology, fluid-structure interaction, and clot growth. These models are often guided by imaging-informed boundary conditions or inspired by benchtop animal models. These gaps in knowledge are critical targets to address necessary improvements in prediction and diagnosis, clinical management, and VTE experimental and computational models.

Perioperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Drain Placement Does Not Increase Venous Thromboembolism Risk After Thoracic and Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence after thoracic and fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR/FEVAR) is high (up to 6-7%) relative to other vascular procedures; however, the etiology for this discrepancy remains unknown. Notably, patients undergoing TEVAR/FEVAR commonly receive cerebrospinal fluid drains (CSFDs) for neuroprotection, requiring interruption of perioperative anticoagulation and prolonged immobility. We hypothesized that CSFDs are a risk factor for VTE after TEVAR/FEVAR. METHODS: Consecutive TEVAR/FEVAR patients at a single center were reviewed (2011-2020). Cerebrospinal fluid drains (CSFDs) were placed based on surgeon preference preoperatively or for spinal cord ischemia (SCI) rescue therapy postoperatively. The primary end-point was VTE occurrence, defined as any new deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) confirmed on imaging within 30 days postoperatively. Routine postoperative VTE screening was not performed. Patients with and without VTE, and subjects with and without CSFDs were compared. Logistic regression was used to explore associations between VTE incidence and CSFD exposure. RESULTS: Eight hundred ninety-seven patients underwent TEVAR/FEVAR and 43% (n = 387) received a CSFD at some point during their care (preoperative: 94% [n = 365/387]; postoperative SCI rescue therapy: 6% [n = 22/387]). CSFD patients were more likely to have previous aortic surgery (44% vs. 37%; P = 0.028) and received more postoperative blood products (780 vs. 405 mL; P = 0.005). The overall VTE incidence was 2.2% (n = 20). 70% (14) patients with VTE had DVT, 50% (10) had PE, and 20% (4) had DVT and PE. Among TEVAR/FEVAR patients with VTE, 65% (n = 13) were symptomatic. Most VTEs (90%, n = 18) were identified inhospital and the median time to diagnosis was 12.5 (interquartile range 7.5-18) days postoperatively. Patients with VTE were more likely to have nonelective surgery (95% vs. 41%; P < 0.001), had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (4.1 vs. 3.7; P < 0.001), required longer intensive care unit admission (24 vs. 12 days; P < 0.001), and received more blood products (1,386 vs. 559 mL; P < 0.001). Venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence was 1.8% in CSFD patients compared to 3.5% in non-CSFD patients (odds ratio 0.70 [95% confidence interval 0.28-1.78, P = 0.300). However, patients receiving CSFDs postoperatively for SCI rescue therapy had significantly greater VTE incidence (9.1% vs. 1.1%; P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: CSFD placement was not associated with an increased risk of VTE in patients undergoing TEVAR/FEVAR. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk was greater in patients undergoing nonelective surgery and those with complicated perioperative courses. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk was greater in patients receiving therapeutic CSFDs compared to prophylactic CSFDs, highlighting the importance of careful patient selection for prophylactic CSFD placement.

Venous thrombosis following endovenous laser ablation with and without thromboprophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs infrequently after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of VTE after EVLA with and without pharmacologic prophylaxis. METHODS: From October 2019 to March 2020, a series of consecutive patients from the prospectively maintained VEINOVA (vein occlusion with various techniques) registry was retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent EVLA with and without postoperative thromboprophylaxis. A 1470-nm laser wavelength with a radial fiber was used for EVLA. Concomitant phlebectomy or sclerotherapy of insufficient tributaries was allowed. Perivenous tumescence was applied with 1% Rapidocaine (lidocaine hydrochloride monohydrate; Sintetica SA). Ablation of varicose veins was performed by continuously drawing back the laser fiber at a power of 10 W, aiming for a linear endovenous energy delivery of 60 to 90 J/cm. Compression stockings were applied postoperatively, and the patients were advised to wear them for 1 week. Duplex ultrasound was performed at the 1- and 4-week follow-up visits to determine the occlusion rate and the occurrence of EHIT and VTE. RESULTS: Overall, 249 patients were identified from the registry. Of the 249 patients, 26 were omitted because of treatment of recurrent varicose veins. Finally, 223 consecutive patients with 223 legs and 227 saphenous veins (159 great saphenous veins, 49 small saphenous veins, and 19 anterior accessory saphenous veins) were included in the final analysis. Their mean age was 58.1 ± 13.8 years, and 167 patients (73.1%) were women. The clinical CEAP (clinical, etiology, anatomy, pathophysiology) classification was C2 for 11 legs (4.9%), C3 for 123 legs (55.2%), C4a or C4b for 86 legs (38.6%), and C5 to C6 for 3 legs (1.4%). Thromboprophylaxis was given to 132 patients (59.2%) for 3 days (rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily to 130 patients [98.5%] and low-molecular-weight heparin to 2 patients [1.5%]). No thromboprophylaxis was administered to 91 patients (40.8%) after EVLA. The average treatment length was 34.2 ± 19.3 cm and the average diameter was 5.0 ± 1.3 mm. At 1 week of follow-up, no thrombotic event had occurred in either group. At 4 weeks of follow-up, one case of EHIT class 2 (1.1%) and one case of pulmonary embolism (1.1%) had occurred in the group without thromboprophylaxis. In the thromboprophylaxis group, one deep vein thrombosis (0.8%) event had occurred (adjusted P = .135). At 1 and 4 weeks of follow-up, the treated varicose veins remained occluded in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Endovenous ablation of truncal varicose veins appears to be safe with a low thrombotic event rate with or without pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. However, more data are needed before a final recommendation regarding the best thromboprophylaxis treatment option can be given.

ClotCatcher: a novel natural language model to accurately adjudicate venous thromboembolism from radiology reports.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate identification of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is critical to develop replicable epidemiological studies and rigorous predictions models. Traditionally, VTE studies have relied on international classification of diseases (ICD) codes which are inaccurate - leading to misclassification bias. Here, we developed ClotCatcher, a novel deep learning model that uses natural language processing to detect VTE from radiology reports. METHODS: Radiology reports to detect VTE were obtained from patients admitted to Emory University Hospital (EUH) and Grady Memorial Hospital (GMH). Data augmentation was performed using the Google PEGASUS paraphraser. This data was then used to fine-tune ClotCatcher, a novel deep learning model. ClotCatcher was validated on both the EUH dataset alone and GMH dataset alone. RESULTS: The dataset contained 1358 studies from EUH and 915 studies from GMH (n = 2273). The dataset contained 1506 ultrasound studies with 528 (35.1%) studies positive for VTE, and 767 CT studies with 91 (11.9%) positive for VTE. When validated on the EUH dataset, ClotCatcher performed best (AUC = 0.980) when trained on both EUH and GMH dataset without paraphrasing. When validated on the GMH dataset, ClotCatcher performed best (AUC = 0.995) when trained on both EUH and GMH dataset with paraphrasing. CONCLUSION: ClotCatcher, a novel deep learning model with data augmentation rapidly and accurately adjudicated the presence of VTE from radiology reports. Applying ClotCatcher to large databases would allow for rapid and accurate adjudication of incident VTE. This would reduce misclassification bias and form the foundation for future studies to estimate individual risk for patient to develop incident VTE.

Ultrasound surveillance for deep venous thrombosis and subsequent venous thromboembolism in adults with trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown routine ultrasound surveillance (RUSS) will facilitate deep vein thrombosis (DVT) detection in patients with trauma and reduce the subsequent incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE); however, the findings were inconsistent. In adults with trauma at a high risk of venous thromboembolism, this systematic review and meta-analysis compared RUSS outcomes with those of "no RUSS." METHODS: Three databases were screened for relevant articles from inception to October 18, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing RUSS with no RUSS were included. We used relative risks (RRs), odds ratios (ORs), and mean differences to pool effect estimates for dichotomous and continuous outcomes. The cochrane risk of bias or the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions were used to assess bias risk. The grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation framework assessed the certainty of the evidence. FINDINGS: Out of 1685 articles, 5 met the inclusion criteria (RCT: 1; observational studies: 4). Observational studies suggested RUSS is associated with higher odds of DVT detection (OR, 4.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.13-7.57; very low certainty). Whereas higher risks of DVT were associated with RUSS in the RCT (distal DVT: RR, 15.48; 95% CI, 7.62-31.48; low certainty, and proximal DVT: RR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.04-5.39; very low certainty). Reduced odds of PE risk were observed with the RUSS (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24-0.91; very low certainty). Observational studies indicated that RUSS had an uncertain effect on mortality (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.06-3.49). In the RCT, times to proximal and distal DVT diagnoses were shorter with RUSS (proximal DVT, mean difference 2.25 days shorter [95% CI, 5.74-1.24]; distal DVT, mean differences 1.56 days shorter [95% CI, 4.22-1.12]; very low certainty for both). Increasing bleeding risk was not linked to the RUSS group (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.31-4.92). INTERPRETATION: The RUSS efficacy in adults with trauma at high risk for venous thromboembolism showed that it increases DVT detection, decreases PE incidence, and shortens the time to DVT diagnosis, with an uncertain impact on mortality. The evidence is low or very low in certainty because of bias, inconsistency, imprecision, and indirectness.

Venous Thromboembolism Management in Pregnant Patients.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) in pregnancy accounts for 10% of maternal deaths in the United States. As maternal morbidity and mortality continue to increase, it is imperative for all specialties interfacing with pregnant patients to understand the current research and guidelines surrounding risk stratification, diagnosis, and treatments of PE in pregnancy. Given the complexity of high-risk pregnancy-associated PE (PA-PE), that is, which is associated with hemodynamic instability or collapse, and the rising popularity of new technologies to treat high-risk PA-PE in the nonpregnant population, this review aims to emphasize the differences in diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of the pregnant and nonpregnant PE patients. Furthermore, this review will cover treatment paradigms that include anticoagulation versus advanced therapies such as systemic thrombolysis, surgical embolectomy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and inferior vena cava disruption as well as the more novel therapies which fall under the umbrella term of catheter-based treatments. Finally, this review will include a case-based review of 2 patients with PA-PE requiring catheter-based therapies and their ultimate clinical outcomes.

Noninvasive and invasive imaging of lower-extremity acute and chronic venous thrombotic disease.

The spectrum of venous thromboembolic (VTE) disease encompasses both acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and chronic postthrombotic changes (CPC). A large percentage of acute DVT patients experience recurrent VTE despite adequate anticoagulation, and may progress to CPC. Further, the role of iliocaval venous obstruction (ICVO) in lower-extremity VTE has been increasingly recognized in recent years. Imaging continues to play an important role in both acute and chronic venous disease. Venous duplex ultrasound remains the gold standard for diagnosing acute VTE. However, imaging of CPC is more complex and may involve computed tomography, magnetic resonance, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, or intravascular ultrasound. In this narrative review, we aim to discuss the full spectrum of venous disease imaging for both acute and chronic venous thrombotic disease.

Reporting age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off values reduces radiology overuse in emergency department patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis.

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of death, associated with substantial morbidity in the absence of treatment. Our aim was, first, to compare the diagnostic performance of D-dimer for the diagnosis of VTE in the emergency department (ED), when reporting conventional cut-off point versus when additionally reporting age-adjusted values. Second, we explored the ordering pattern of Doppler ultrasound (US) and computerized tomographic pulmonary angiogram (CTPA), before and after reporting of the aforementioned age-adjusted cut-off value. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to compare the diagnostic performance of D-dimer as a screening for VTE when reporting the conventional cut-off value versus when additionally including the age-adjusted metrics, and a quasi-experimental study to explore the ordering of Doppler US and CTPA before the age-specific metrics were shared in the report in ED patients between 50 and 100 years-old with D-dimer ordering. RESULTS: The cross-sectional study included 392 patients, 25 with VTE. The specificity using an age-adjusted cut-off value was significantly higher (0.51) compared to a single absolute cut-off (0.42), and the negative likelihood ratio was lower as well (0.08 vs. 0.19), but again not statistically significant. In the quasi-experimental study, there was a decrease in the rate of use of both CTPA and Doppler US (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The intervention improved the use of the D-dimer result in the ED and helped improve the request for imaging tests.

[Venous thromboembolism and risk factors for deep vein thrombosis in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy].

Among various types of cancers, pancreatic cancer is known to be prone to venous thromboembolism (VTE). We investigated the complication rate of VTE and risk factors for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 51 patients with pancreatic cancer who had undergone chemotherapy at our hospital from January 2016 to March 2021, had their D-dimer levels measured at the initial visit, and had undergone venous ultrasonography if D-dimer levels were elevated. At the initial visit, the complication rate of VTE was 35.3% (18/51 patients). Multivariate analysis revealed that the risk factors for DVT were primary tumors in the pancreas's body and tail and elevated D-dimer levels. Patients with DVT tended to have shorter overall survival than those without (218 vs 523 days). Patients with pancreatic cancer frequently develop VTE and should be aggressively screened for thrombosis, particularly in those with primary tumors in the pancreas's body and tail and elevated D-dimer levels.

Thromboembolic outcomes are decreased with the use of a standardized venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis protocol for patients undergoing superficial venous procedures.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with venous insufficiency can be treated with ablation or phlebectomy, or both. Patients undergoing superficial venous procedures have an elevated risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). At our institution, we initiated a standardized protocol in which patients with a Caprini score (2005 version) of ≥8 are treated with 1 week of prophylactic anticoagulation after the procedure. Duplex ultrasound was performed at 1 week and then within 90 days after the procedure. This aim of the present study was to determine the thrombotic and clinical outcomes after superficial vein procedures using a standardized protocol for DVT/PE risk assessment and prophylaxis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of superficial vein procedures from 2015 to 2021 at a single center. The patient demographics, CEAP (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology) clinical class, venous clinical severity score, patient-reported outcomes, treatment type, Caprini scores, pre- and postoperative anticoagulation use, and outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics were used for the patient demographics, procedure details, and unadjusted surgical outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between procedure type and DVT and PE after adjusting for patient characteristics, disease severity, periprocedural anticoagulation, and Caprini score. RESULTS: A total of 1738 limbs were treated with ablation (n = 820), phlebectomy (n = 181), or ablation and phlebectomy (n = 737). More patients were women (67.1%) and White (90.9%). The overall incidence of DVT/PE was 1.4%. Patients undergoing ablation with phlebectomy had higher rates of DVT/PE (2.7%) than those undergoing ablation (0.2%) or phlebectomy alone (1.7%; P < .01). However, only 30% of DVTs were above the knee. On multivariate analysis, only the procedure type predicted for DVT/PE. However, patients undergoing ablation and phlebectomy achieved better patient-reported outcomes (Caprini score, 5.9) compared with those undergoing ablation (Caprini score, 7.2) or phlebectomy (Caprini score, 7.9) alone (P < .01). The best improvement in the venous clinical severity score was seen with phlebectomy alone. CONCLUSIONS: The expected difference in the DVT/PE rates between high- and low-risk groups did not materialize in our patients, perhaps secondary to the additional chemoprophylaxis prescribed for the high-risk cohort (Caprini score, ≥8). These results call for a randomized trial to assess the efficacy of a standardized protocol in the reduction of DVT/PE after superficial vein procedures.

Prognostic Value of Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging for Predicting Venous Thromboembolism in Children With Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging can detect changes in arterial inflammation, but has not been used to evaluate chemotherapy-induced venous inflammation or assess risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric oncology. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT imaging of venous inflammation for predicting VTE occurrence in the 12 months after lymphoma diagnosis in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients. METHODS: Pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with lymphoma diagnoses (n=71) who underwent whole-body PET/CT imaging at initial staging of disease and first therapeutic follow-up were retrospectively evaluated for serial changes in lower extremity venous uptake of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose. PET/CT images were used to segment and quantify serial changes in fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake for veins of interest (ie, popliteal and femoral). Incidence of VTE was assessed for 12 months after lymphoma diagnosis. RESULTS: PET/CT detected a significantly higher inflammatory response in the femoral (P=0.012) and popliteal (P=0.013) veins of patients who experienced a VTE event compared with those who remained VTE free in the 12 months after diagnosis. The area under the curve values for receiver operator characteristics analyses were 0.76 (femoral vein) and 0.77 (popliteal vein) based on incidence of VTE occurrence. Univariate analyses demonstrated that PET/CT-derived changes in femoral (P=0.008) and popliteal (P=0.002) vein inflammation were significantly associated with VTE-free survival at 12 months after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT imaging detects treatment-induced venous toxicity that may provide insight into risk of VTE events in pediatric and adolescent and young adult patients with lymphoma.

Outcomes of a single-center experience in eliminating routine postoperative duplex ultrasound screening after endovenous ablation.

OBJECTIVES: The current guidelines recommend routine postoperative duplex ultrasound (DUS) screening after endovenous ablation (EVA). This is a grade 2C recommendation, and several contemporary reports have called for revision of this recommendation as there is insufficient evidence to support universal DUS screening after EVA. There are currently no studies that evaluate outcomes among EVA patients who did not have DUS screening. The aim of our study is to present outcomes from our single-center experience among patients who did not have DUS routinely performed after EVA. METHODS: We performed a single-center, prospective cohort study that included consecutive patients who underwent EVA of the great saphenous vein at our institution between September 30, 2021, and March 15, 2022. At 30 days after the procedure, electronic medical records were queried to identify patients who may have presented for the evaluation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) symptoms. RESULTS: Over the study period, a total of 80 lower extremity EVA procedures (71 endovenous laser ablation and 9 radiofrequency ablation) were performed among 76 patients. Postoperative DUS was performed on 24 patients, of whom none were identified as having endovenous heat-induced thrombosis. Of the 54 patients who did not have DUS, a 30-day postprocedure chart review revealed that none of these patients were seen for symptoms of VTE. We estimate total cost savings of $14,289 by eliminating routine DUS without impact to clinical outcomes after EVA. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative DUS assessment after EVA comes with associated health care cost and has low yield given that the incidence of clinically significant endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (3 and 4) is rare. In our experience, eliminating routine DUS had no impact on clinical outcomes, improved vascular lab access, and had a positive financial impact in our organization. Limiting DUS screening to EVA patients who exhibit symptoms of VTE can be a cost-effective approach that limits unnecessary imaging, time, and resources with no potential change in clinical outcomes based on our data. Further research is required, and a randomized controlled trial would be ideal to answer this question.

Management, control, and decision making in unexpected recurrent venous thromboembolism in COVID-19: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 was spread worldwide, as a pandemic, from December 2019. Venous thromboembolism events can inflict patients with coronavirus disease 2019 during the hospitalization or convalescent period. Therefore, monitoring of these patients, in terms of venous thromboembolism events signs and symptoms, and timely management of antithrombotic agents are of great importance. CASE REPORT: A 45-year-old Iranian man, who is the first author of this case report, was infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and displayed the typical signs and symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019. Although reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for coronavirus disease 2019, and specific immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, were negative at first, chest computed tomography scan showed the characteristic pattern of lung involvement of a coronavirus disease 2019 infection including bilateral and multilobar ground-glass opacities. At that time, there were no signs or symptoms of deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary thromboembolism, so these were not investigated. About 30 hours after hospital discharge, the patient presented back to the hospital with acute-onset chest pain. We instantly tested his blood for D-dimer, and sent him to take a Doppler sonography of his lower legs and a chest computed tomography angiography in search of pulmonary thromboembolism and deep-vein thrombosis. Although we could confirm pulmonary thromboembolism with computed tomography angiography in our patient, there were no signs or symptoms of venous thromboembolism in his lower legs, and color Doppler sonography of lower limbs was normal. So, the patient was treated with rivaroxaban as an antithrombotic agent. After some days, he was discharged in good condition. About 1 month later, he was referred to our hospital because of left lower limb edema. Although he was under antithrombotic therapy, color Doppler sonography of lower limbs revealed acute deep-vein thrombosis of the left leg. Hence, we decided to shift antithrombotic therapy from rivaroxaban to warfarin, as it is more potent than rivaroxaban in recurrent venous thromboembolism and when taking new oral anticoagulants. Unlike rivaroxaban, which needs no blood test to monitor its efficacy but has a warning for signs and symptoms of bleeding, warfarin therapy must be monitored carefully by regular blood tests for prothrombin time and international normalized ratio to maintain them in the therapeutic range. The patient was informed about the bleeding cautions, and required regular check of prothrombin time and international normalized ratio to maintain them in the proper and advised range of treatment (international normalized ratio therapeutic range 2-3). CONCLUSION: In the case of unexpected recurrent venous thromboembolism in coronavirus disease 2019, especially when patients are taking rivaroxaban or other new oral anticoagulants, such drugs should be substituted by warfarin, with routine follow-up, to maintain the value of prothrombin time and international normalized ratio within the therapeutic range.

Venous Thromboembolism in a Patient with Interrupted Inferior Vena Cava and Compressed Azygos Continuation: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

We report an unusual case of a 40-year-old male patient who experienced painful swelling of the left lower limb that persisted for 1 week. Imaging modalities not only confirmed the diagnosis of acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE), but also an incidental finding of interrupted inferior vena cava (IVC). This congenital anomaly is uncommon but rarely associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE). The azygos continuation was compressed by the descending aorta against the 11th thoracic vertebrae, which was identified as the cause of VTE. He was treated successfully with anticoagulation and compression therapy. The patient was discharged with lifelong oral Rivaroxaban and remained asymptomatic. In the literature, only 9 cases of interrupted IVC-associated PE were identified but none was due to significant venous compression.

Preoperative incidence and risk factors of deep vein thrombosis in Japanese patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Preoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a risk factor for postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE), causing severe mortality. Early detection of preoperative DVT is essential to prevent postoperative VTE. However, little is known regarding preoperative DVT in patients undergoing major surgery. The present study aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors of preoperative DVT in patients admitted for total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: From August 2017 to September 2022, 243 patients admitted for THA at our institution were enrolled in this study. Patients medical records and preoperative laboratory data were retrospectively collected. According to the results of lower-limb ultrasonography, patients were divided into either the non-DVT (n = 136) or DVT (n = 43) group. The incidence of DVT and independent risk factors for preoperative DVT were investigated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The mean age was 74.0 ± 8.4 years. Preoperative DVT was diagnosed in 43 of the 243 (17.7%) patients. The risk of DVT was significantly high (p < 0.05) in patients with advanced age, increased D-dimer levels, and malnutrition status, as assessed by the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI). Multivariate analysis showed that advanced age, increased D-dimer level, and malnutrition status assessed by the GNRI were independent risk factors for preoperative DVT. CONCLUSION: A high incidence of preoperative DVT was observed in patients undergoing THA. Advanced age, increased D-dimer levels, and malnutrition assessed by the GNRI increased the risk of preoperative DVT. Screening high-risk subgroups for preoperative DVT is necessary to prevent postoperative VTE.

Venous Thromboembolism: Exploring Incidence and Utility of Screening in Individuals With Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of VTE in the population with brain injuries (BIs) using ultrasonography, and to assess the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) development and/or bleeding complications related to anticoagulation. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Acute rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 238 individuals with moderate to severe BI who were routinely screened for VTE with ultrasonography on admission to rehabilitation (N=238). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Retrospective chart review was performed to identify individuals who were diagnosed with VTE at the following 3 time points: in acute care prior to admission to rehabilitation, at the time of admission diagnosed via screening examination, and after admission to rehabilitation. Additionally, risk factors for VTE, PE, and incidence of bleeding complications related to therapeutic anticoagulation were assessed. RESULTS: 123 deep vein thromboses (DVTs) were identified with 38.2% in acute care (n=47), 69.1% on admission to rehabilitation (n=85), and 7.3% during the course of rehabilitation stay (n=9). Risk factors for development of VTE included age at injury, body mass index, injury etiology, history of neurosurgical procedure, and surgery during inpatient rehabilitation. Of those who were placed on therapeutic anticoagulation due to admission diagnosis of VTE (n=50), 2% developed recurrent DVT and 2% had bleeding complications. There was zero incidence of PE. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated a high prevalence of VTEs identified on screening ultrasonography on admission to inpatient rehabilitation among individuals with moderate to severe BIs, and low complications related to anticoagulation. Given the findings of this study, prospective research in ultrasonography screening for VTE in moderate to severe BI is needed.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Hospitalized With a Central Line.

OBJECTIVES: Patients hospitalized with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to determine whether the adoption of a VTE protocol would change rates of medical VTE prophylaxis (low molecular weight heparin) in patients with IBD and a central venous catheter (CVC), while subsequently decreasing the incidence of VTE in this population. METHODS: A protocol for VTE prophylaxis in IBD was established in March of 2018. Every patient hospitalized with an IBD flare and central venous access from March 2013 to March 2020 was identified. Study data, including patient demographics, rates of Doppler ultrasound (US), and rates of VTE were collected using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes, CPT codes, and chart review retrospectively. Determination of an IBD flare was based on physician global assessment. Groups were compared with independent-sample t tests and chi-squared tests. RESULTS: A total of 313 hospitalizations across 187 different patients were identified that met criteria including IBD and central venous access. VTE prophylaxis increased from 5.24% (n = 12) prior to the intervention to 63.10% (n = 53) after the intervention [chi-square (1, N = 313) = 125.0192, P < 0.001]. Rate of Doppler US increased from 9.17% (n = 21) prior to the intervention to 17.86% (n = 15) after the intervention [chi-square (1, N = 313) = 4.5562, P < 0.05]. Diagnosis of VTE increased from 0.87% (n = 2) prior to the intervention to 7.14% (n = 6) after the intervention [chi-square (1, N = 313) = 9.6992, P < 0.01]. There were no significant differences in the demographic characteristics pre- versus post-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of Doppler US and VTE prophylaxis use increased significantly after implementation of a VTE protocol. Rates of VTE diagnosis also increased, though we suspect this may be due to missed diagnoses prior to implementation of the protocol and increased risk awareness after the protocol was established.

Postoperative D-dimer levels predict venous thromboembolisms detected with contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: In the literature, factors associated with postoperative venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are limited. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to identify risk and predictive factors for VTEs. METHODS: This retrospective study included 136 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACLR with mechanical prophylaxis between April 2012 and July 2022. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was applied to detect VTEs comprising deep venous thromboses and pulmonary embolisms 7 days after surgery. Data including age, sex, body mass index, concomitant treatments, graft types, smoking status, operative and tourniquet times, postoperative D-dimer levels, and other laboratory test results, were collected for analyses. The incidence of radiographically confirmed VTEs and the associated risk factors, such as age, sex, body mass index, concomitant treatments, graft types, smoking status, operative and tourniquet times, postoperative D-dimer levels, and other laboratory test results, were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall incidence of radiographic VTEs was 11.0% (15 cases) in 136 patients. There was one symptomatic patient who had Homan's sign. Multivariable analysis indicated that postoperative D-dimer level was an independent factor related to a radiographic VTE after ACLR, although there was no association between radiographic VTEs and preoperative status or operation status. The optimal cutoff value for postoperative D-dimer level was 2.8 µg/ml according to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, with a sensitivity of 80.0% and specificity of 83.5%. CONCLUSION: The incidence of ACLR-associated radiographical VTEs (deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) under mechanical prophylaxis was 11.0% in this study. An elevated D-dimer level at 7 days after surgery is an independent predictor of VTE in patients undergoing ACLR. The postoperative D-dimer level is a more reliable marker for identifying VTE in patients who underwent ACLR.